Spam 25% Less Sodium vs SPAM Classic
Overall, SPAM Classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spam 25% Less Sodium | SPAM Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 314 kcal | 321 kcal |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 24.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.7 g | 9.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- SPAM Classic has 15% less fat (24.3 g vs 28.6 g).
- SPAM Classic has 27% less sugar (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- SPAM Classic has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.5 g).
- SPAM Classic has 17% more protein (15 g vs 12.5 g).
- SPAM Classic has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Spam 25% Less Sodium
Pork with Ham, Mechanically Separated Chicken, Water, Salt, Modified Potato Starch, Sugar, Sodium Phosphates, Potassium Chloride, Sodium Nitrite
SPAM Classic
pork with ham, salt, water, modified potato starch, sugar, sodium nitrite
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spam 25% Less Sodium or SPAM Classic?
Overall, SPAM Classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Spam 25% Less Sodium has fewer calories: 314 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
SPAM Classic has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.