Comparison

SPAM Classic vs Chopped Pork And Ham

Overall, SPAM Classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSPAM ClassicChopped Pork And Ham
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 321 kcal 292 kcal
Fat 24.3 g 24.3 g
Saturated fat 9.7 g 9.7 g
Sugars 1.3 g 1.3 g
Salt 0 g 2.4 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 15 g 15 g
Additives14
AllergensNone listedPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • SPAM Classic has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.4 g).
  • SPAM Classic has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Chopped Pork And Ham lists: Pork.

Ingredients

SPAM Classic

pork with ham, salt, water, modified potato starch, sugar, sodium nitrite

Chopped Pork And Ham

Pork 89%, Salt, Starch, Water, Ham 2%, Sugar, Stabiliser: Trisodium Diphosphate, Flavourings, Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite

FAQ

Which is healthier: SPAM Classic or Chopped Pork And Ham?

Overall, SPAM Classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chopped Pork And Ham has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

SPAM Classic has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons