SPAM Classic vs Beef luncheon meat
Overall, Beef luncheon meat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | SPAM Classic | Beef luncheon meat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 321 kcal | 256 kcal |
| Fat | 24.3 g | 18.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.7 g | 7.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 14.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Beef luncheon meat has 20% fewer calories (256 kcal vs 321 kcal).
- Beef luncheon meat has 23% less fat (18.7 g vs 24.3 g).
- Beef luncheon meat has 23% less saturated fat (7.5 g vs 9.7 g).
- Beef luncheon meat has no sugar, while SPAM Classic has 1.3 g.
- SPAM Classic has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.7 g).
- SPAM Classic has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Beef luncheon meat lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
SPAM Classic
pork with ham, salt, water, modified potato starch, sugar, sodium nitrite
Beef luncheon meat
Viande 87 % (bœuf, poulet, dinde), amidon de _blé_ (contient du _gluten_), eau, sel, protéines de _soja_, stabilisant: E450ii, épices, assaisonnement, _lactose_, extrait d'épice, protéine de _soja_, conservateur: E250.
FAQ
Which is healthier: SPAM Classic or Beef luncheon meat?
Overall, Beef luncheon meat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Beef luncheon meat has fewer calories: 256 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beef luncheon meat has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.