Chopped Pork And Ham vs Beef luncheon meat
Overall, Beef luncheon meat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chopped Pork And Ham | Beef luncheon meat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 292 kcal | 256 kcal |
| Fat | 24.3 g | 18.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.7 g | 7.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 14.4 g |
| Additives | 4 | 3 |
| Allergens | Pork | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Beef luncheon meat has 12% fewer calories (256 kcal vs 292 kcal).
- Beef luncheon meat has 23% less fat (18.7 g vs 24.3 g).
- Beef luncheon meat has 23% less saturated fat (7.5 g vs 9.7 g).
- Beef luncheon meat has no sugar, while Chopped Pork And Ham has 1.3 g.
- Chopped Pork And Ham has 11% less salt (2.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Only Chopped Pork And Ham lists: Pork.
- Only Beef luncheon meat lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chopped Pork And Ham
Pork 89%, Salt, Starch, Water, Ham 2%, Sugar, Stabiliser: Trisodium Diphosphate, Flavourings, Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite
Beef luncheon meat
Viande 87 % (bœuf, poulet, dinde), amidon de _blé_ (contient du _gluten_), eau, sel, protéines de _soja_, stabilisant: E450ii, épices, assaisonnement, _lactose_, extrait d'épice, protéine de _soja_, conservateur: E250.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chopped Pork And Ham or Beef luncheon meat?
Overall, Beef luncheon meat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Beef luncheon meat has fewer calories: 256 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beef luncheon meat has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.