Comparison

Chopped Pork And Ham vs Mortadella luncheon

Overall, Mortadella luncheon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChopped Pork And HamMortadella luncheon
Nutri-Score e a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 292 kcal 186 kcal
Fat 24.3 g 9.2 g
Saturated fat 9.7 g 0 g
Sugars 1.3 g 0 g
Salt 2.4 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 15 g 10.2 g
Additives46
AllergensPorkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mortadella luncheon has 36% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 292 kcal).
  • Mortadella luncheon has 62% less fat (9.2 g vs 24.3 g).
  • Mortadella luncheon has no saturated fat, while Chopped Pork And Ham has 9.7 g.
  • Mortadella luncheon has no sugar, while Chopped Pork And Ham has 1.3 g.
  • Mortadella luncheon has no salt, while Chopped Pork And Ham has 2.4 g.
  • Chopped Pork And Ham has 32% more protein (15 g vs 10.2 g).
  • Mortadella luncheon has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Chopped Pork And Ham lists: Pork.
  • Only Mortadella luncheon lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Chopped Pork And Ham

Pork 89%, Salt, Starch, Water, Ham 2%, Sugar, Stabiliser: Trisodium Diphosphate, Flavourings, Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite

Mortadella luncheon

viande de dinde, eau, fécule de pomme de terre, sel, protéines de lait, épices, dextrose, stabilisants (E450, E451, E452), arôme, antioxydant (E316), exhausteur de goût (E621), conservateur (E250)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chopped Pork And Ham or Mortadella luncheon?

Overall, Mortadella luncheon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mortadella luncheon has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mortadella luncheon has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons