Frühstücksfleisch vs Mortadella luncheon
Overall, Mortadella luncheon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frühstücksfleisch | Mortadella luncheon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 286 kcal | 186 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.9 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 10.2 g |
| Additives | 3 | 6 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mortadella luncheon has 35% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 286 kcal).
- Mortadella luncheon has 65% less fat (9.2 g vs 26 g).
- Mortadella luncheon has no saturated fat, while Frühstücksfleisch has 9.9 g.
- Mortadella luncheon has no sugar, while Frühstücksfleisch has 0.5 g.
- Mortadella luncheon has no salt, while Frühstücksfleisch has 2.3 g.
- Frühstücksfleisch has 22% more protein (13 g vs 10.2 g).
- Mortadella luncheon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Frühstücksfleisch
Schweinefleisch 87%, Trinkwasser, Salz, Stabilisator: Triphosphate, _Molkepulver_, Gewürzextrakte, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit.
Mortadella luncheon
viande de dinde, eau, fécule de pomme de terre, sel, protéines de lait, épices, dextrose, stabilisants (E450, E451, E452), arôme, antioxydant (E316), exhausteur de goût (E621), conservateur (E250)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frühstücksfleisch or Mortadella luncheon?
Overall, Mortadella luncheon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mortadella luncheon has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mortadella luncheon has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.