SPAM Classic vs Mortadella luncheon
Overall, Mortadella luncheon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | SPAM Classic | Mortadella luncheon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 321 kcal | 186 kcal |
| Fat | 24.3 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.7 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 10.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mortadella luncheon has 42% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 321 kcal).
- Mortadella luncheon has 62% less fat (9.2 g vs 24.3 g).
- Mortadella luncheon has no saturated fat, while SPAM Classic has 9.7 g.
- Mortadella luncheon has no sugar, while SPAM Classic has 1.3 g.
- SPAM Classic has 32% more protein (15 g vs 10.2 g).
- Mortadella luncheon has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mortadella luncheon lists: Milk.
Ingredients
SPAM Classic
pork with ham, salt, water, modified potato starch, sugar, sodium nitrite
Mortadella luncheon
viande de dinde, eau, fécule de pomme de terre, sel, protéines de lait, épices, dextrose, stabilisants (E450, E451, E452), arôme, antioxydant (E316), exhausteur de goût (E621), conservateur (E250)
FAQ
Which is healthier: SPAM Classic or Mortadella luncheon?
Overall, Mortadella luncheon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mortadella luncheon has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mortadella luncheon has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.