Spam 25% Less Sodium vs Frühstücksfleisch
Overall, Frühstücksfleisch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spam 25% Less Sodium | Frühstücksfleisch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 314 kcal | 286 kcal |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.7 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frühstücksfleisch has 72% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Only Frühstücksfleisch lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Spam 25% Less Sodium
Pork with Ham, Mechanically Separated Chicken, Water, Salt, Modified Potato Starch, Sugar, Sodium Phosphates, Potassium Chloride, Sodium Nitrite
Frühstücksfleisch
Schweinefleisch 87%, Trinkwasser, Salz, Stabilisator: Triphosphate, _Molkepulver_, Gewürzextrakte, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spam 25% Less Sodium or Frühstücksfleisch?
Overall, Frühstücksfleisch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frühstücksfleisch has fewer calories: 286 kcal versus 314 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Frühstücksfleisch has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.