Comparison

Soy For Cooking vs OAT

Overall, OAT has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSoy For CookingOAT
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 172 kcal 39 kcal
Fat 17.1 g 0.7 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.9 g 2.6 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.2 g 0.7 g
Protein 2 g 0.7 g
Additives40
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • OAT has 77% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 172 kcal).
  • OAT has 96% less fat (0.7 g vs 17.1 g).
  • OAT has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Soy For Cooking has 27% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.6 g).
  • OAT has 71% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Soy For Cooking has 65% more protein (2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • OAT has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Soy For Cooking lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Soy For Cooking

Spécialité culinaire à base d'huile de tournesol et de soja, stérilisée UHT, issue de l'agriculture biologique, Ingrédients: eau, 15% huile de tournesol', 8% fèves de soja décortiquées', sucre de canne¹, amidon de tapioca', émulsifiant: lécithines¹ (soja), stabilisants: gomme guar', gomme xanthane, sel de mer, 'Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique, Traces éventuelles de fruits à coque,

OAT

Water, Gluten Free Oats (9%), Calcium (Calcium Carbonate), Chicory Root Fibre, Citrus Fibre, Salt, Vitamins (D, Riboflavin, B12), iodine (Potassium iodide)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Soy For Cooking or OAT?

Overall, OAT has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

OAT has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Soy For Cooking has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons