Comparison

Sourdough Bistro Classic Loaf vs Jason's Sourdough

Overall, Jason's Sourdough has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSourdough Bistro Classic Loa...Jason's Sourdough
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 237 kcal 226 kcal
Fat 2 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.2 g
Sugars 1 g 2.6 g
Salt 1.4 g 0.5 g
Fiber 3 g 3.6 g
Protein 9 g 9.3 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Jason's Sourdough has 45% less fat (1.1 g vs 2 g).
  • Sourdough Bistro Classic Loaf has 62% less sugar (1 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Jason's Sourdough has 65% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Jason's Sourdough has 16% more fiber (3.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Jason's Sourdough has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Jason's Sourdough is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Sourdough Bistro Classic Loaf

Unbleached wheat flour, Water, Light rye flour, Whole grain rye flour, Wheat gluten, Salt, Cultured wheat flour*, Yeast, Ground wheat, Lactic acid*, Malted barley flour, Enzymes, Ascorbic acid, Rice flour (for dusting). *Order may vary. Contains: Wheat, Rye, Barley. May contain: Almonds, Eggs, Milk, Pecans, Sesame seeds, Soy, Walnuts.

Jason's Sourdough

Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Water, Wholemeal Spelt (Wheat) Flour, Sprouted Spelt (Wheat) Grains (5%), Rye Flour, Salt, Fermented Wheat Flour.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sourdough Bistro Classic Loaf or Jason's Sourdough?

Overall, Jason's Sourdough has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Jason's Sourdough has fewer calories: 226 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sourdough Bistro Classic Loaf has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons