Sourdough Bistro Classic Loaf vs Fiber frisk
Overall, Fiber frisk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sourdough Bistro Classic Loa... | Fiber frisk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 237 kcal | 221 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 5.9 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 8.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiber frisk has 35% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Fiber frisk has 40% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Fiber frisk has 35% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Fiber frisk has 49% more fiber (5.9 g vs 3 g).
- Fiber frisk has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sourdough Bistro Classic Loaf
Unbleached wheat flour, Water, Light rye flour, Whole grain rye flour, Wheat gluten, Salt, Cultured wheat flour*, Yeast, Ground wheat, Lactic acid*, Malted barley flour, Enzymes, Ascorbic acid, Rice flour (for dusting). *Order may vary. Contains: Wheat, Rye, Barley. May contain: Almonds, Eggs, Milk, Pecans, Sesame seeds, Soy, Walnuts.
Fiber frisk
Vatten, _vetemjöl_*, _rågkärnor_* (16%), fullkornsmjöl av _vete_*, surdeg av _råg_* (3%), _vetegluten_, fullkornsmjöl av _råg_*, _rågmjöl_*, salt, fermenterat _vetemjöl_, _kornmalt_, jäst, _havrekli_*, dextros, mjölbehandlingsmedel (askorbinsyra), maltmjöl av _korn_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sourdough Bistro Classic Loaf or Fiber frisk?
Overall, Fiber frisk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiber frisk has fewer calories: 221 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fiber frisk has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.