RågLevain vs Fiber frisk
Overall, Fiber frisk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | RågLevain | Fiber frisk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 221 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 5.9 g |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 8.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiber frisk has 83% less sugar (0.6 g vs 3.6 g).
- RågLevain has no salt, while Fiber frisk has 0.9 g.
- Fiber frisk has 46% more fiber (5.9 g vs 3.2 g).
Ingredients
RågLevain
_Vetemjöl_, vatten, surdeg på _fullkornsråg_* och _fullkornsdurumvete_* (10%), groddade _rågkärnor_*, _vetegluten_, _fullkornsrågmjöl_*, _vetekli_, malt av _korn_, jäst, salt, mjölbehandlingsmedel (askorbinsyra). *Fullkornsingrediens.
Fiber frisk
Vatten, _vetemjöl_*, _rågkärnor_* (16%), fullkornsmjöl av _vete_*, surdeg av _råg_* (3%), _vetegluten_, fullkornsmjöl av _råg_*, _rågmjöl_*, salt, fermenterat _vetemjöl_, _kornmalt_, jäst, _havrekli_*, dextros, mjölbehandlingsmedel (askorbinsyra), maltmjöl av _korn_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: RågLevain or Fiber frisk?
Overall, Fiber frisk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiber frisk has fewer calories: 221 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fiber frisk has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.