Sonnenblumenkerne geschält vs Viva
Overall, Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sonnenblumenkerne geschält | Viva |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 665 kcal | 578 kcal |
| Fat | 59 g | 52.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 15 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 9 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 20.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Viva has 13% fewer calories (578 kcal vs 665 kcal).
- Viva has 10% less fat (52.9 g vs 59 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has 14% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 5.2 g).
- Viva has 15% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.2 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 15 g).
- Viva has 26% more fiber (9 g vs 6.7 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sonnenblumenkerne geschält is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sonnenblumenkerne geschält
Sonnenblumenkerne.
Viva
Sonnenblumenkerne 95%, Meersalz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sonnenblumenkerne geschält or Viva?
Overall, Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Viva has fewer calories: 578 kcal versus 665 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Viva has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.