Comparison

Sonnenblumenkerne geschält vs Viva

Overall, Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSonnenblumenkerne geschältViva
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 665 kcal 578 kcal
Fat 59 g 52.9 g
Saturated fat 4.5 g 5.2 g
Sugars 3.2 g 2.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 15 g
Fiber 6.7 g 9 g
Protein 21 g 20.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Viva has 13% fewer calories (578 kcal vs 665 kcal).
  • Viva has 10% less fat (52.9 g vs 59 g).
  • Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has 14% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Viva has 15% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 15 g).
  • Viva has 26% more fiber (9 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Sonnenblumenkerne geschält is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Sonnenblumenkerne geschält

Sonnenblumenkerne.

Viva

Sonnenblumenkerne 95%, Meersalz

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sonnenblumenkerne geschält or Viva?

Overall, Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Viva has fewer calories: 578 kcal versus 665 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Viva has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons