Comparison
Sonnenblumenkerne vs Viva
Overall, Sonnenblumenkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sonnenblumenkerne | Viva |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 643 kcal | 578 kcal |
| Fat | 57 g | 52.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 15 g |
| Fiber | 7.8 g | 9 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 20.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Peanuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Viva has 10% fewer calories (578 kcal vs 643 kcal).
- Viva has 18% less saturated fat (5.2 g vs 6.4 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne has 100% less salt (0 g vs 15 g).
- Viva has 13% more fiber (9 g vs 7.8 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne has 14% more protein (24 g vs 20.7 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sonnenblumenkerne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sonnenblumenkerne lists: Nuts, Peanuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Sonnenblumenkerne
Sonnenblumenkerne 100%
Viva
Sonnenblumenkerne 95%, Meersalz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sonnenblumenkerne or Viva?
Overall, Sonnenblumenkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Viva has fewer calories: 578 kcal versus 643 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Viva has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Viva vs Pipes de carbassa crues
Sonnenblumenkerne geschä... vs Sonnenblumenkerne
Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipes de carbassa crues
Sonnenblumenkerne vs Semi di girasole
Sonnenblumenkerne geschä... vs Viva
Sonnenblumenkerne geschä... vs Viva
Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipas girasol naturales...
Viva vs Pipas girasol naturales...