Comparison
Sonnenblumenkerne geschält vs Viva
Overall, Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sonnenblumenkerne geschält | Viva |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 644 kcal | 578 kcal |
| Fat | 52 g | 52.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 15 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 9 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 20.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Viva has 10% fewer calories (578 kcal vs 644 kcal).
- Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has 14% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 5.2 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has 100% less salt (0 g vs 15 g).
- Viva has 100% more fiber (9 g vs 0 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sonnenblumenkerne geschält is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sonnenblumenkerne geschält
Sonnenblumenkerne.
Viva
Sonnenblumenkerne 95%, Meersalz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sonnenblumenkerne geschält or Viva?
Overall, Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Viva has fewer calories: 578 kcal versus 644 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Viva vs Pipes de carbassa crues
Sonnenblumenkerne geschä... vs Sonnenblumenkerne
Sonnenblumenkerne vs Viva
Sonnenblumenkerne geschä... vs Sonnenblumenkerne geschä...
Sonnenblumenkerne geschä... vs Viva
Sonnenblumenkerne geschä... vs Pipes de carbassa crues
Sonnenblumenkerne geschä... vs Semi di girasole
Sonnenblumenkerne geschä... vs Pipas girasol naturales...