Viva vs Pipes de carbassa crues
Overall, Pipes de carbassa crues has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Viva | Pipes de carbassa crues |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 578 kcal | 618 kcal |
| Fat | 52.9 g | 49 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.2 g | 8.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 15 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 20.7 g | 30 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Viva has 40% less saturated fat (5.2 g vs 8.7 g).
- Pipes de carbassa crues has 49% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Pipes de carbassa crues has 100% less salt (0 g vs 15 g).
- Viva has 33% more fiber (9 g vs 6 g).
- Pipes de carbassa crues has 31% more protein (30 g vs 20.7 g).
- Pipes de carbassa crues has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pipes de carbassa crues lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Viva
Sonnenblumenkerne 95%, Meersalz
Pipes de carbassa crues
Pipes de carbassa (origen: Xina). gluten_soja_llet_fruits_de_closca_grans_de_sèsam
FAQ
Which is healthier: Viva or Pipes de carbassa crues?
Overall, Pipes de carbassa crues has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Viva has fewer calories: 578 kcal versus 618 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipes de carbassa crues has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.