Comparison

Sonnenblumenkerne geschält vs Pipes de carbassa crues

Overall, Pipes de carbassa crues has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSonnenblumenkerne geschältPipes de carbassa crues
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 665 kcal 618 kcal
Fat 59 g 49 g
Saturated fat 4.5 g 8.7 g
Sugars 3.2 g 1.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 6.7 g 6 g
Protein 21 g 30 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipes de carbassa crues has 17% less fat (49 g vs 59 g).
  • Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has 48% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Pipes de carbassa crues has 56% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Sonnenblumenkerne geschält has 10% more fiber (6.7 g vs 6 g).
  • Pipes de carbassa crues has 30% more protein (30 g vs 21 g).
  • Only Pipes de carbassa crues lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Sonnenblumenkerne geschält

Sonnenblumenkerne.

Pipes de carbassa crues

Pipes de carbassa (origen: Xina). gluten_soja_llet_fruits_de_closca_grans_de_sèsam

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sonnenblumenkerne geschält or Pipes de carbassa crues?

Overall, Pipes de carbassa crues has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipes de carbassa crues has fewer calories: 618 kcal versus 665 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipes de carbassa crues has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons