Pipes de carbassa crues vs Pipas girasol naturales peladas
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipes de carbassa crues | Pipas girasol naturales pela... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 618 kcal | 602 kcal |
| Fat | 49 g | 50.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.7 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | 12.5 g |
| Protein | 30 g | 25.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 34% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 8.7 g).
- Pipes de carbassa crues has 63% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.8 g).
- Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 52% more fiber (12.5 g vs 6 g).
- Pipes de carbassa crues has 14% more protein (30 g vs 25.8 g).
- Only Pipes de carbassa crues lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Pipes de carbassa crues
Pipes de carbassa (origen: Xina). gluten_soja_llet_fruits_de_closca_grans_de_sèsam
Pipas girasol naturales peladas
Pipas de girasol peladas,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipes de carbassa crues or Pipas girasol naturales peladas?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas girasol naturales peladas has fewer calories: 602 kcal versus 618 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipes de carbassa crues has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.