Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipas girasol naturales peladas
Overall, Pipas girasol naturales peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sonnenblumenkerne | Pipas girasol naturales pela... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 643 kcal | 602 kcal |
| Fat | 57 g | 50.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.8 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.8 g | 12.5 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 25.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Peanuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 11% less fat (50.9 g vs 57 g).
- Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 11% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 6.4 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne has 26% less sugar (2.8 g vs 3.8 g).
- Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 38% more fiber (12.5 g vs 7.8 g).
- Only Sonnenblumenkerne lists: Nuts, Peanuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Sonnenblumenkerne
Sonnenblumenkerne 100%
Pipas girasol naturales peladas
Pipas de girasol peladas,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sonnenblumenkerne or Pipas girasol naturales peladas?
Overall, Pipas girasol naturales peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas girasol naturales peladas has fewer calories: 602 kcal versus 643 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sonnenblumenkerne has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.