Comparison

Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipas girasol naturales peladas

Overall, Pipas girasol naturales peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSonnenblumenkernePipas girasol naturales pela...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 643 kcal 602 kcal
Fat 57 g 50.9 g
Saturated fat 6.4 g 5.7 g
Sugars 2.8 g 3.8 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 7.8 g 12.5 g
Protein 24 g 25.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNuts, Peanuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 11% less fat (50.9 g vs 57 g).
  • Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 11% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Sonnenblumenkerne has 26% less sugar (2.8 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 38% more fiber (12.5 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Only Sonnenblumenkerne lists: Nuts, Peanuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Sonnenblumenkerne

Sonnenblumenkerne 100%

Pipas girasol naturales peladas

Pipas de girasol peladas,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sonnenblumenkerne or Pipas girasol naturales peladas?

Overall, Pipas girasol naturales peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas girasol naturales peladas has fewer calories: 602 kcal versus 643 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sonnenblumenkerne has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons