Viva vs Pipas girasol naturales peladas
Overall, Pipas girasol naturales peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Viva | Pipas girasol naturales pela... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 578 kcal | 602 kcal |
| Fat | 52.9 g | 50.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.2 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 15 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9 g | 12.5 g |
| Protein | 20.7 g | 25.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Viva has 28% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.8 g).
- Pipas girasol naturales peladas has no salt, while Viva has 15 g.
- Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 28% more fiber (12.5 g vs 9 g).
- Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 20% more protein (25.8 g vs 20.7 g).
- Pipas girasol naturales peladas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pipas girasol naturales peladas is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Viva
Sonnenblumenkerne 95%, Meersalz
Pipas girasol naturales peladas
Pipas de girasol peladas,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Viva or Pipas girasol naturales peladas?
Overall, Pipas girasol naturales peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Viva has fewer calories: 578 kcal versus 602 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Viva has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.