Comparison

Viva vs Pipas girasol naturales peladas

Overall, Pipas girasol naturales peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVivaPipas girasol naturales pela...
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 578 kcal 602 kcal
Fat 52.9 g 50.9 g
Saturated fat 5.2 g 5.7 g
Sugars 2.7 g 3.8 g
Salt 15 g 0 g
Fiber 9 g 12.5 g
Protein 20.7 g 25.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Viva has 28% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Pipas girasol naturales peladas has no salt, while Viva has 15 g.
  • Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 28% more fiber (12.5 g vs 9 g).
  • Pipas girasol naturales peladas has 20% more protein (25.8 g vs 20.7 g).
  • Pipas girasol naturales peladas has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pipas girasol naturales peladas is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Viva

Sonnenblumenkerne 95%, Meersalz

Pipas girasol naturales peladas

Pipas de girasol peladas,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Viva or Pipas girasol naturales peladas?

Overall, Pipas girasol naturales peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Viva has fewer calories: 578 kcal versus 602 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Viva has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons