Comparison

Soft Pflaumen vs Pflaumen entsteint

Overall, Soft Pflaumen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice
Soft Pflaumen

Soft Pflaumen

Seeberger · 200g
b NOVA 1
Pflaumen entsteint

Pflaumen entsteint

Seeberger · 135g
c NOVA 3

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSoft PflaumenPflaumen entsteint
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 230 kcal 225 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 28 g 26 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 5.1 g —
Protein 2.8 g 2.8 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Ingredients

Soft Pflaumen

Pruneaux 100%

Pflaumen entsteint

Pflaumen, Konservierungsstoff: Kaliumsorbat.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Soft Pflaumen or Pflaumen entsteint?

Overall, Soft Pflaumen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pflaumen entsteint has fewer calories: 225 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pflaumen entsteint has less sugar: 26 g versus 28 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Soft Pflaumen vs Ciruelas desecadas sin h... Pflaumen entsteint vs Ciruelas desecadas sin h... Soft Pflaumen vs Pitted Prunes Pflaumen entsteint vs Pitted Prunes Soft Pflaumen vs Prune deshidratate fără... Pflaumen entsteint vs Prune deshidratate fără... Soft Pflaumen vs Dried prunes, pitted and... Pflaumen entsteint vs Dried prunes, pitted and...