Comparison
Soft Pflaumen vs Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi
Overall, Soft Pflaumen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soft Pflaumen | Prune deshidratate fără sâmb... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 28 g | 36.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | 8.2 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soft Pflaumen has 23% less sugar (28 g vs 36.5 g).
- Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi has 38% more fiber (8.2 g vs 5.1 g).
- Soft Pflaumen has 18% more protein (2.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Soft Pflaumen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Soft Pflaumen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Soft Pflaumen
Pruneaux 100%
Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi
prune deshidratate fără sâmburi, sorbat de potasiu
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soft Pflaumen or Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi?
Overall, Soft Pflaumen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soft Pflaumen has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soft Pflaumen has less sugar: 28 g versus 36.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Soft Pflaumen vs Ciruelas desecadas sin h...
Soft Pflaumen vs Pitted Prunes
Prune deshidratate fără... vs Ciruelas desecadas sin h...
Prune deshidratate fără... vs Pitted Prunes
Prune deshidratate fără... vs Dried prunes, pitted and...
Ciruelas sin hueso vs Prune deshidratate fără...
Amaz!n Prunes vs Prune deshidratate fără...
Pflaumen entsteint vs Prune deshidratate fără...