Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi vs Pitted Prunes
Overall, Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prune deshidratate fără sâmb... | Pitted Prunes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 245 kcal | 237 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 36.5 g | 43.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 8.2 g | 6.9 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi has 17% less sugar (36.5 g vs 43.9 g).
- Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi has 16% more fiber (8.2 g vs 6.9 g).
Ingredients
Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi
prune deshidratate fără sâmburi, sorbat de potasiu
Pitted Prunes
Partially Rehydrated Pitted Prunes, Preservative: Potassium Sorbate. Storage Instructions
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi or Pitted Prunes?
Overall, Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pitted Prunes has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prune deshidratate fără sâmburi has less sugar: 36.5 g versus 43.9 g per 100 g.