Pitted Prunes vs Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso
Overall, Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pitted Prunes | Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 237 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 43.9 g | 38 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.9 g | 7.1 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso has 13% less sugar (38 g vs 43.9 g).
Ingredients
Pitted Prunes
Partially Rehydrated Pitted Prunes, Preservative: Potassium Sorbate. Storage Instructions
Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso
Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso, E-202
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pitted Prunes or Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso?
Overall, Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pitted Prunes has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso has less sugar: 38 g versus 43.9 g per 100 g.