Comparison
Soft Pflaumen vs Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso
Overall, Soft Pflaumen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soft Pflaumen | Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 28 g | 38 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | 7.1 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soft Pflaumen has 26% less sugar (28 g vs 38 g).
- Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso has 28% more fiber (7.1 g vs 5.1 g).
- Soft Pflaumen has 21% more protein (2.8 g vs 2.2 g).
- Soft Pflaumen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Soft Pflaumen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Soft Pflaumen
Pruneaux 100%
Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso
Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso, E-202
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soft Pflaumen or Ciruelas desecadas sin hueso?
Overall, Soft Pflaumen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soft Pflaumen has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soft Pflaumen has less sugar: 28 g versus 38 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Pitted Prunes vs Ciruelas desecadas sin h...
Dried prunes, pitted and... vs Ciruelas desecadas sin h...
Ciruelas sin hueso vs Ciruelas desecadas sin h...
Amaz!n Prunes vs Ciruelas desecadas sin h...
Pflaumen entsteint vs Ciruelas desecadas sin h...
Soft Pflaumen vs Pitted Prunes
Prune deshidratate fără... vs Ciruelas desecadas sin h...
Soft Pflaumen vs Prune deshidratate fără...