Soft and chewy oat bar vs Riskaker
Overall, Riskaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soft and chewy oat bar | Riskaker |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 423 kcal | 390 kcal |
| Fat | 21.2 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 19.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 13.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 15.4 g | 8.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Apple, Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riskaker has 84% less fat (3.3 g vs 21.2 g).
- Riskaker has 58% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.9 g).
- Riskaker has 98% less sugar (0.4 g vs 19.2 g).
- Soft and chewy oat bar has 74% more fiber (13.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Soft and chewy oat bar has 45% more protein (15.4 g vs 8.5 g).
- Riskaker has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Soft and chewy oat bar lists: Apple, Nuts.
Ingredients
Soft and chewy oat bar
Cage free egg whites, dairy-free oats, soy-free oats, gluten-free oats, apples, almonds, cinnamon, honey
Riskaker
Ris 99,7 %, salt. Kan inneholde spor av sesam og soya.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soft and chewy oat bar or Riskaker?
Overall, Riskaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riskaker has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 423 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riskaker has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 19.2 g per 100 g.