Comparison
Eggs vs Riskaker
Overall, Riskaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Eggs | Riskaker |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 140 kcal | 390 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 8.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Eggs has 64% fewer calories (140 kcal vs 390 kcal).
- Riskaker has 67% less fat (3.3 g vs 10 g).
- Riskaker has 92% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 10 g).
- Eggs has no sugar, while Riskaker has 0.4 g.
- Riskaker has 100% more fiber (3.5 g vs 0 g).
- Eggs has 29% more protein (12 g vs 8.5 g).
- Riskaker has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Eggs lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Eggs
12 Fresh Brown Eggs, Grade A Large, Pasture Raised, Non-GMO Feed
Riskaker
Ris 99,7 %, salt. Kan inneholde spor av sesam og soya.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Eggs or Riskaker?
Overall, Riskaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Eggs has fewer calories: 140 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eggs has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.