Pistachio nut bar vs Riskaker
Overall, Riskaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pistachio nut bar | Riskaker |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 550 kcal | 390 kcal |
| Fat | 32.5 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 30 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 8.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riskaker has 29% fewer calories (390 kcal vs 550 kcal).
- Riskaker has 90% less fat (3.3 g vs 32.5 g).
- Riskaker has 79% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 3.8 g).
- Riskaker has 99% less sugar (0.4 g vs 30 g).
- Pistachio nut bar has no salt, while Riskaker has 0.3 g.
- Pistachio nut bar has 53% more fiber (7.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Pistachio nut bar has 32% more protein (12.5 g vs 8.5 g).
- Riskaker has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pistachio nut bar lists: Nuts, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Pistachio nut bar
Crunchy nut protein contains pistachios, gluten-free oats, coconuts, sesame seeds, and other tree nuts. May contain shell fragments.
Riskaker
Ris 99,7 %, salt. Kan inneholde spor av sesam og soya.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pistachio nut bar or Riskaker?
Overall, Riskaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riskaker has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 550 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riskaker has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 30 g per 100 g.