Smash vs Puré de Patatas con Leche
Overall, Smash has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Smash | Puré de Patatas con Leche |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 371 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 8.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 5 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smash has 86% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 371 kcal).
- Smash has 81% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.6 g).
- Smash has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Smash has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.7 g).
- Puré de Patatas con Leche has 83% more fiber (7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Puré de Patatas con Leche has 86% more protein (8.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Only Puré de Patatas con Leche lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Smash
dehydrated potato (98%), salt, emulsifier (mono - and diglycerides of fatty acids), antioxidants (ascorbic acid, sodium metabisulphite (sulphites)), flavouring. allergy advice: for allergens, see ingredient in bold. may also contain milk.,
Puré de Patatas con Leche
Patatas deshidratadas 89%, leche en polvo 10%, emulgente (E471), estabilizador (E450i), extracto de especia (cúrcuma), conservador (metabisulfito sodio), antioxidantes (E304, E300).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Smash or Puré de Patatas con Leche?
Overall, Smash has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smash has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smash has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.