Smash vs Stocki
Overall, Smash has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Smash | Stocki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 72 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 3 | 6 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smash has 26% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 72 kcal).
- Smash has 55% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Smash has 83% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Smash has 71% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Smash has 68% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Stocki has 48% more protein (2.3 g vs 1.2 g).
- Only Smash lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
- Only Stocki lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Smash
dehydrated potato (98%), salt, emulsifier (mono - and diglycerides of fatty acids), antioxidants (ascorbic acid, sodium metabisulphite (sulphites)), flavouring. allergy advice: for allergens, see ingredient in bold. may also contain milk.,
Stocki
99% kartoffeln¹ (schweiz), emulgator (mono und diglyceride von speisefettsäuren), magermilchpulver, antioxidationsmittel (natriumascorbat, ascorbylpalmitat), gewürzextrakt, stabilisator (citronensäure, diphosphat). ¹aus nachhaltig angebauten kartoffeln.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Smash or Stocki?
Overall, Smash has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smash has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 72 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smash has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.