Kartoffelpürre vs Smash
Overall, Smash has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kartoffelpürre | Smash |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 59 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smash has 10% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 59 kcal).
- Smash has 80% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
- Kartoffelpürre is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Smash lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Kartoffelpürre
Kartoffelflocken (Kartoffeln* 96 %, Antioxidationsmittel (Extrakt aus Rosmarin)), Meersalz, Paprika*, Kurkuma*, weißer Pfeffer*
Smash
dehydrated potato (98%), salt, emulsifier (mono - and diglycerides of fatty acids), antioxidants (ascorbic acid, sodium metabisulphite (sulphites)), flavouring. allergy advice: for allergens, see ingredient in bold. may also contain milk.,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kartoffelpürre or Smash?
Overall, Smash has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smash has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 59 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kartoffelpürre has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.