Comparison

Kartoffelpürre vs Puré de Patatas con Leche

Overall, Kartoffelpürre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKartoffelpürrePuré de Patatas con Leche
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 59 kcal 371 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 2.6 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1.8 g
Sugars 0.5 g 3.7 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.3 g
Fiber 1.2 g 7 g
Protein 1.2 g 8.5 g
Additives15
AllergensNone listedMilk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kartoffelpürre has 84% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 371 kcal).
  • Kartoffelpürre has 81% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Kartoffelpürre has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Kartoffelpürre has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Puré de Patatas con Leche has 73% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Puré de Patatas con Leche has 83% more fiber (7 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Puré de Patatas con Leche has 86% more protein (8.5 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Kartoffelpürre is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Puré de Patatas con Leche lists: Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Kartoffelpürre

Kartoffelflocken (Kartoffeln* 96 %, Antioxidationsmittel (Extrakt aus Rosmarin)), Meersalz, Paprika*, Kurkuma*, weißer Pfeffer*

Puré de Patatas con Leche

Patatas deshidratadas 89%, leche en polvo 10%, emulgente (E471), estabilizador (E450i), extracto de especia (cúrcuma), conservador (metabisulfito sodio), antioxidantes (E304, E300).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kartoffelpürre or Puré de Patatas con Leche?

Overall, Kartoffelpürre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kartoffelpürre has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kartoffelpürre has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons