Siļke vs Hareng
Overall, Siļke has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Siļke | Hareng |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 174 kcal | 359 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 3.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 6.6 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Siļke has 52% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 359 kcal).
- Siļke has 63% less fat (12 g vs 32 g).
- Siļke has 24% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 3.8 g).
- Siļke has 90% less sugar (0.9 g vs 9 g).
- Hareng has 58% less salt (1.8 g vs 4.3 g).
- Siļke has 53% more protein (14 g vs 6.6 g).
- Hareng has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Siļke lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Siļke
Salted Atlantic herring fillets skinless 80% (Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) (caught: FAO 27 (North-East Atlantic-A: Norwegian Sea and /or B: North Sea and/or C: Icelandic waters), fishing gear - surrounding nets and lift nets/ trawls (location A, Band/or Csee next to Use by date)) fillets (from fish), salt, dextrose, flavour enhancer E621, acidity regulators: E575, E330, E334, preservatives: E211, E202), refined oil 20 % (1: rapeseed; 2: sunflower (oil type 1 or 2 see next to Use by date)). Lot No/ Use by: see on the package. e
Hareng
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Siļke or Hareng?
Overall, Siļke has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Siļke has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Siļke has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 9 g per 100 g.