Rollmops vs Siļke
Overall, Siļke has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rollmops | Siļke |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 4.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 10 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | Fish, Mustard | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Siļke has 20% less fat (12 g vs 15 g).
- Siļke has 17% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 3.5 g).
- Siļke has 74% less sugar (0.9 g vs 3.4 g).
- Rollmops has 42% less salt (2.5 g vs 4.3 g).
- Siļke has 29% more protein (14 g vs 10 g).
- Rollmops has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Rollmops lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Rollmops
Eau, harengs 39% (pêché dans l'Atlantique Nord-Est, chaluts [chaluts pélagiques à panneaux]), concombres au vinaigre 8% (concombres, vinaigre d'alcool, sel de cuisine, sucre, extrait d'épice [contient: moutarde]), sucre, sel de cuisine, vinaigre d'alcool, arôme naturel d'aneth, arôme naturel d'oignon, arôme naturel de citron.
Siļke
Salted Atlantic herring fillets skinless 80% (Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) (caught: FAO 27 (North-East Atlantic-A: Norwegian Sea and /or B: North Sea and/or C: Icelandic waters), fishing gear - surrounding nets and lift nets/ trawls (location A, Band/or Csee next to Use by date)) fillets (from fish), salt, dextrose, flavour enhancer E621, acidity regulators: E575, E330, E334, preservatives: E211, E202), refined oil 20 % (1: rapeseed; 2: sunflower (oil type 1 or 2 see next to Use by date)). Lot No/ Use by: see on the package. e
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rollmops or Siļke?
Overall, Siļke has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Siļke has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Siļke has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.