Filets de harengs vs Siļke
Overall, Siļke has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de harengs | Siļke |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 303 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 27.5 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 6.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 4.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | — |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 5 | 6 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Fish, Milk, Mustard | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Siļke has 43% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 303 kcal).
- Siļke has 56% less fat (12 g vs 27.5 g).
- Siļke has 24% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 3.8 g).
- Siļke has 86% less sugar (0.9 g vs 6.5 g).
- Filets de harengs has 49% less salt (2.2 g vs 4.3 g).
- Siļke has 51% more protein (14 g vs 6.9 g).
- Filets de harengs has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filets de harengs lists: Eggs, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Filets de harengs
Filets de HARENGS marinés (Clupea Harengus) 40%, huile de colza, cornichons marinés, oignons marinés, CRÈME 6,6% (CRÈME, stabilisant : carraghénane), eau, sucre, YAOURT (LAIT écremé, amidon de tapioca), sel, vinaigre d'alcool, jaune d'ŒUF, MOUTARDE moulue, épices (dont curcuma), aneth déshydraté 0,1%, régulateurs d’acidité : acide citrique, acide acétique, extraits d'épices, épaississants: gomme de guar et de xanthane
Siļke
Salted Atlantic herring fillets skinless 80% (Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) (caught: FAO 27 (North-East Atlantic-A: Norwegian Sea and /or B: North Sea and/or C: Icelandic waters), fishing gear - surrounding nets and lift nets/ trawls (location A, Band/or Csee next to Use by date)) fillets (from fish), salt, dextrose, flavour enhancer E621, acidity regulators: E575, E330, E334, preservatives: E211, E202), refined oil 20 % (1: rapeseed; 2: sunflower (oil type 1 or 2 see next to Use by date)). Lot No/ Use by: see on the package. e
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de harengs or Siļke?
Overall, Siļke has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Siļke has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 303 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Siļke has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.