Rollmops vs Hareng
Overall, Rollmops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rollmops | Hareng |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 359 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 3.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 10 g | 6.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rollmops has 47% fewer calories (190 kcal vs 359 kcal).
- Rollmops has 53% less fat (15 g vs 32 g).
- Rollmops has 62% less sugar (3.4 g vs 9 g).
- Hareng has 28% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Rollmops has 34% more protein (10 g vs 6.6 g).
- Only Rollmops lists: Fish, Mustard.
Ingredients
Rollmops
Eau, harengs 39% (pêché dans l'Atlantique Nord-Est, chaluts [chaluts pélagiques à panneaux]), concombres au vinaigre 8% (concombres, vinaigre d'alcool, sel de cuisine, sucre, extrait d'épice [contient: moutarde]), sucre, sel de cuisine, vinaigre d'alcool, arôme naturel d'aneth, arôme naturel d'oignon, arôme naturel de citron.
Hareng
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rollmops or Hareng?
Overall, Rollmops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rollmops has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rollmops has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 9 g per 100 g.