Rollmops vs Hareng
Overall, Hareng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rollmops | Hareng |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 160 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 10 g | 9.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hareng has 16% fewer calories (160 kcal vs 190 kcal).
- Hareng has 13% less fat (13 g vs 15 g).
- Hareng has 11% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Hareng has 85% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Rollmops has 17% less salt (2.5 g vs 3 g).
- Only Rollmops lists: Fish, Mustard.
Ingredients
Rollmops
Eau, harengs 39% (pêché dans l'Atlantique Nord-Est, chaluts [chaluts pélagiques à panneaux]), concombres au vinaigre 8% (concombres, vinaigre d'alcool, sel de cuisine, sucre, extrait d'épice [contient: moutarde]), sucre, sel de cuisine, vinaigre d'alcool, arôme naturel d'aneth, arôme naturel d'oignon, arôme naturel de citron.
Hareng
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rollmops or Hareng?
Overall, Hareng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hareng has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hareng has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.