Comparison

Sesame Honey Cashews vs Maple Pecans Glazed Mix

Overall, Sesame Honey Cashews has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSesame Honey CashewsMaple Pecans Glazed Mix
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 533 kcal 500 kcal
Fat 46.2 g 37 g
Saturated fat 4.9 g 3.7 g
Sugars 9.5 g 40.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 1 g
Fiber 8.5 g 6.1 g
Protein 16.1 g 7.4 g
Additives00
AllergensMilk, Nuts, Sesame seedsApple, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Maple Pecans Glazed Mix has 20% less fat (37 g vs 46.2 g).
  • Maple Pecans Glazed Mix has 25% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Sesame Honey Cashews has 77% less sugar (9.5 g vs 40.7 g).
  • Sesame Honey Cashews has 88% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Sesame Honey Cashews has 28% more fiber (8.5 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Sesame Honey Cashews has 54% more protein (16.1 g vs 7.4 g).
  • Sesame Honey Cashews has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Sesame Honey Cashews is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Sesame Honey Cashews lists: Milk, Sesame seeds.
  • Only Maple Pecans Glazed Mix lists: Apple.

Ingredients

Sesame Honey Cashews

CASHEWS, SESAME SEEDS, SUGAR, BUTTER (MILK), SALT, HONEY, COCOA POWDER

Maple Pecans Glazed Mix

PECANS, WALNUTS, DRIED CHERRIES (CHERRIES, SUGAR), DRIED APPLES (APPLES, SUGAR), ORGANIC CANE SUGAR, MAPLE SUGAR, ORGANIC TAPIOCA SYRUP, BROWN SUGAR, SEA SALT, CINNAMON, NATURAL FLAVORS

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sesame Honey Cashews or Maple Pecans Glazed Mix?

Overall, Sesame Honey Cashews has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Maple Pecans Glazed Mix has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sesame Honey Cashews has less sugar: 9.5 g versus 40.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons