Comparison

Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil vs Sardines à l'Huile Végétale

Overall, Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSepia Filletes Of Mackerel I...Sardines à l'Huile Végétale
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 203 kcal 222 kcal
Fat 7.7 g 13.8 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 3.8 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 33.4 g 24.5 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 44% less fat (7.7 g vs 13.8 g).
  • Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 58% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 38% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 27% more protein (33.4 g vs 24.5 g).
  • Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Sardines à l'Huile Végétale lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil

Maquereaux, huile végétale, sel.

Sardines à l'Huile Végétale

_Sardines_ (Sardina Pilchardus), huile de soja, sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil or Sardines à l'Huile Végétale?

Overall, Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has fewer calories: 203 kcal versus 222 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons