Sardines sans arêtes au naturel vs Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil
Overall, Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sardines sans arêtes au naturel
Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sardines sans arêtes au natu... | Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel I... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 187 kcal | 203 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 22 g | 33.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 30% less fat (7.7 g vs 11 g).
- Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 53% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 3.4 g).
- Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 34% more protein (33.4 g vs 22 g).
- Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sardines sans arêtes au naturel
Sardines, eau, sel.
Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil
Maquereaux, huile végétale, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sardines sans arêtes au naturel or Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil?
Overall, Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sardines sans arêtes au naturel has fewer calories: 187 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sardines sans arêtes au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.