Comparison

Sardines sans arêtes au naturel vs Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil

Overall, Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSardines sans arêtes au natu...Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel I...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 187 kcal 203 kcal
Fat 11 g 7.7 g
Saturated fat 3.4 g 1.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 22 g 33.4 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 30% less fat (7.7 g vs 11 g).
  • Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 53% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 34% more protein (33.4 g vs 22 g).
  • Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sardines sans arêtes au naturel

Sardines, eau, sel.

Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil

Maquereaux, huile végétale, sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sardines sans arêtes au naturel or Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil?

Overall, Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sardines sans arêtes au naturel has fewer calories: 187 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sardines sans arêtes au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons