Sardines vs Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil
Overall, Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sardines | Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel I... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 234 kcal | 203 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 24 g | 33.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 13% fewer calories (203 kcal vs 234 kcal).
- Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 36% less fat (7.7 g vs 12 g).
- Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 45% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.9 g).
- Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has 28% more protein (33.4 g vs 24 g).
- Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sardines
_Sardines_ (Sardina pilchardus), huile d'olive vierge extra, sel (zone de pêche indiquée sur la tranche)
Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil
Maquereaux, huile végétale, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sardines or Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil?
Overall, Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sepia Filletes Of Mackerel In Oil has fewer calories: 203 kcal versus 234 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sardines has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.