Comparison

Scottish Smoked Trout vs Regenbogen-Forellenfilets

Overall, Scottish Smoked Trout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientScottish Smoked TroutRegenbogen-Forellenfilets
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — —
Calories 208 kcal 139 kcal
Fat 11.2 g 6.4 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 1.6 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.4 g 2.3 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 23.3 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Regenbogen-Forellenfilets has 33% fewer calories (139 kcal vs 208 kcal).
  • Regenbogen-Forellenfilets has 43% less fat (6.4 g vs 11.2 g).
  • Regenbogen-Forellenfilets has 24% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Scottish Smoked Trout has 38% less salt (1.4 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Scottish Smoked Trout has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Scottish Smoked Trout has 14% more protein (23.3 g vs 20 g).
  • Scottish Smoked Trout has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Scottish Smoked Trout

smoked rainbow trout _fish_ (96%), sea sat, Demerara sugar

Regenbogen-Forellenfilets

Forellenfilet (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Aquakultur gewonnen in Dänemar Kochsalz. Heissgeräuchert (durchgegart). Ingrédients : filet de truite (Oncorhynchus mykiss) poisson élevé au Danemark, sel de cuisine. Fumés à chaud (cults). Ingredienti: filetto di trota (Oncorhynchus mykiss) allevata in Danimarca, sale da cucina. Affumicata a caldo (colti).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Scottish Smoked Trout or Regenbogen-Forellenfilets?

Overall, Scottish Smoked Trout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Regenbogen-Forellenfilets has fewer calories: 139 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Regenbogen-Forellenfilets has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons