Pavés de truite vs Regenbogen-Forellenfilets
Overall, Pavés de truite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pavés de truite | Regenbogen-Forellenfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 139 kcal |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Regenbogen-Forellenfilets has 14% fewer calories (139 kcal vs 161 kcal).
- Regenbogen-Forellenfilets has 28% less fat (6.4 g vs 8.9 g).
- Pavés de truite has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Pavés de truite has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pavés de truite
Truite
Regenbogen-Forellenfilets
Forellenfilet (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Aquakultur gewonnen in Dänemar Kochsalz. Heissgeräuchert (durchgegart). Ingrédients : filet de truite (Oncorhynchus mykiss) poisson élevé au Danemark, sel de cuisine. Fumés à chaud (cults). Ingredienti: filetto di trota (Oncorhynchus mykiss) allevata in Danimarca, sale da cucina. Affumicata a caldo (colti).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pavés de truite or Regenbogen-Forellenfilets?
Overall, Pavés de truite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Regenbogen-Forellenfilets has fewer calories: 139 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pavés de truite has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.