Filets de truite vs Regenbogen-Forellenfilets
Overall, Filets de truite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filets de truite
Regenbogen-Forellenfilets
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de truite | Regenbogen-Forellenfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 139 kcal | 139 kcal |
| Fat | 6.9 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19.1 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de truite has 33% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Filets de truite has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Filets de truite has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filets de truite
Truite arc-en-ciel (_poisson_) élevée, élaborée et conditionnée en France (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Présence naturelle d'arêtes
Regenbogen-Forellenfilets
Forellenfilet (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Aquakultur gewonnen in Dänemar Kochsalz. Heissgeräuchert (durchgegart). Ingrédients : filet de truite (Oncorhynchus mykiss) poisson élevé au Danemark, sel de cuisine. Fumés à chaud (cults). Ingredienti: filetto di trota (Oncorhynchus mykiss) allevata in Danimarca, sale da cucina. Affumicata a caldo (colti).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de truite or Regenbogen-Forellenfilets?
Overall, Filets de truite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de truite has fewer calories: 139 kcal versus 139 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de truite has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.