Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen vs Backerbsen
Overall, Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbse... | Backerbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 511 kcal | 553 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 7.4 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has 20% less fat (28 g vs 35 g).
- Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has 86% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 17 g).
- Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has 50% less sugar (1 g vs 2 g).
- Backerbsen has 24% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.5 g).
- Backerbsen has 48% more fiber (7.4 g vs 3.9 g).
- Only Backerbsen lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen
_Weizenmehl_ (56%), Sonnenblumenöl, Maismehl, Steinsalz, _Magermilchpulver_, Muskat, Backpulver (Maisstärke, Säuerungsmittel: Kaliumtartrate aus Bio-Traubensaft, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat)
Backerbsen
Búzaliszt, pálmazsír, étkezési só, tojáspor, sovány tejpor, élesztő.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen or Backerbsen?
Overall, Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has fewer calories: 511 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has less sugar: 1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.