Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen vs Backerbsen
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbse... | Backerbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 511 kcal | 522 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has 78% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 11 g).
- Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has 50% less sugar (1 g vs 2 g).
- Backerbsen has 17% more fiber (4.7 g vs 3.9 g).
- Backerbsen has 13% more protein (9 g vs 7.8 g).
- Only Backerbsen lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen
_Weizenmehl_ (56%), Sonnenblumenöl, Maismehl, Steinsalz, _Magermilchpulver_, Muskat, Backpulver (Maisstärke, Säuerungsmittel: Kaliumtartrate aus Bio-Traubensaft, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat)
Backerbsen
Weizenmehl, Sonnenblumenöl 30%, Salz, Erbsenmehl, Volleipulver, Hefe, Magermilchpulver
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen or Backerbsen?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has fewer calories: 511 kcal versus 522 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has less sugar: 1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.