Dinkel Backerbsen vs Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen
Overall, Dinkel Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Dinkel Backerbsen
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dinkel Backerbsen | Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbse... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 513 kcal | 511 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 8.1 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 4 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dinkel Backerbsen has 40% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Dinkel Backerbsen
Dinkelmehl, Sonnenblumenöl, Maismehl, Steinsalz, Magermilchpulver, Muskat, Backpulver (Maisstärke, Säuerungsmittel: Reinweinstein (Monokaliumtartrat), Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat)
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen
_Weizenmehl_ (56%), Sonnenblumenöl, Maismehl, Steinsalz, _Magermilchpulver_, Muskat, Backpulver (Maisstärke, Säuerungsmittel: Kaliumtartrate aus Bio-Traubensaft, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dinkel Backerbsen or Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen?
Overall, Dinkel Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has fewer calories: 511 kcal versus 513 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dinkel Backerbsen has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.