Comparison

Backerbsen vs Dinkel Backerbsen

Overall, Dinkel Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBackerbsenDinkel Backerbsen
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 514 kcal 513 kcal
Fat 30 g 29 g
Saturated fat 15.9 g 2.6 g
Sugars 4 g 0.6 g
Salt 3.3 g 2.5 g
Fiber — 3.9 g
Protein 8.7 g 8.1 g
Additives24
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dinkel Backerbsen has 84% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 15.9 g).
  • Dinkel Backerbsen has 85% less sugar (0.6 g vs 4 g).
  • Dinkel Backerbsen has 24% less salt (2.5 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Dinkel Backerbsen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Backerbsen lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Backerbsen

Weizenmehl, Palmöl, Süßmolkenpulver, Maismehl, Salz, Backtriebmittel (E 450, E 500), Stärke, Volleipulver

Dinkel Backerbsen

Dinkelmehl, Sonnenblumenöl, Maismehl, Steinsalz, Magermilchpulver, Muskat, Backpulver (Maisstärke, Säuerungsmittel: Reinweinstein (Monokaliumtartrat), Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Backerbsen or Dinkel Backerbsen?

Overall, Dinkel Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dinkel Backerbsen has fewer calories: 513 kcal versus 514 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dinkel Backerbsen has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons