Backerbsen vs Backerbsen
Overall, Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backerbsen | Backerbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 520 kcal | 514 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 15.9 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | — |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 8.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Backerbsen has 85% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 15.9 g).
- Backerbsen has 75% less sugar (1 g vs 4 g).
- Backerbsen has 24% less salt (2.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Backerbsen has 10% more protein (8.7 g vs 7.8 g).
- Backerbsen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Backerbsen lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Backerbsen
56% Weizenmehl", 27% Sonnenblumenöl*, Maismehl*, Speisesalz, Magermilchpulver*, Muskat*, Backpulver* (Maisstärke*, Säuerungsmittel: Monoka - liumtartrat, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat) *aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau Trocken lagern und vor Licht und Wärme schützen.
Backerbsen
Weizenmehl, Palmöl, Süßmolkenpulver, Maismehl, Salz, Backtriebmittel (E 450, E 500), Stärke, Volleipulver
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backerbsen or Backerbsen?
Overall, Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Backerbsen has fewer calories: 514 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backerbsen has less sugar: 1 g versus 4 g per 100 g.