Comparison

Backerbsen vs Backerbsen

Overall, Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBackerbsenBackerbsen
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 520 kcal 553 kcal
Fat 29 g 35 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 17 g
Sugars 1 g 2 g
Salt 2.5 g 1.9 g
Fiber 4 g 7.4 g
Protein 7.8 g 8 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Backerbsen has 17% less fat (29 g vs 35 g).
  • Backerbsen has 86% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 17 g).
  • Backerbsen has 50% less sugar (1 g vs 2 g).
  • Backerbsen has 24% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Backerbsen has 46% more fiber (7.4 g vs 4 g).
  • Only Backerbsen lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Backerbsen

56% Weizenmehl", 27% Sonnenblumenöl*, Maismehl*, Speisesalz, Magermilchpulver*, Muskat*, Backpulver* (Maisstärke*, Säuerungsmittel: Monoka - liumtartrat, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat) *aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau Trocken lagern und vor Licht und Wärme schützen.

Backerbsen

Búzaliszt, pálmazsír, étkezési só, tojáspor, sovány tejpor, élesztő.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Backerbsen or Backerbsen?

Overall, Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Backerbsen has fewer calories: 520 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Backerbsen has less sugar: 1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons